Tuesday, 7 September 2010

Water dam (or water wastage?)

The Chairman (Mr. Birkenstock),

 

Dear Sir,

 

Find attached 3 photos taken by me. These three photos indicate, in my opinion and on a previous management decision made, wastage of water.

 

In the management meeting of July 2008 a discussion was held regarding a ‘dam’ Mr E Kok’s children made and played in. Mr. D Bosch gave this dam the thumbs up because his grandchildren also made a similar dam. By majority rule the meeting concluded that such dams serve no purpose and constitute ‘waste of water’ (no matter the benefit to the children). The main objection raised was that the dam was built in sand and just siphon away into the sand.

 

The photos attached highlight a similar dam on common property. Unlike the children’s dams, that was well constructed and contained the water in the boundaries of the dam walls, it is clear that this dam runs over and ‘wastes’ even more water.

 

The porpoise of this letter is:

a)       To bring the chairman’s attention to this condition (a dam built on sand with water that drain off into the sand).

b)       To ask the chairman what the porpoise of such a dam would be?

c)       To ask the chairman what the difference between this dam and the children’s dam may be?

d)       To ask the chairman, should this be double standards or an unauthorised dam, the take appropriate action to stop this practise and have the dam filled.

 

 

Sincerely,

 


GEN (Ernest) Bessinger

PO Box 106,

Waterpoort, 0905

Cell +27 73 073 3505

Fax  0867416512

Google profile:  http://www.google.com/profiles/ernestbes/

 

Confidentiality Warning

This message/ e-mail contain confidential information and is intended only for the message recipient. Any disclosure, retransmission, dissemination, misuse or other use of this information is strictly prohibited and will lead to prosecution. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.

The Disclaimer forms part of the content of this email in terms of section 11 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 25 of 2002.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment