The Chairman (Mr. Frik Birkenstock),
Dear Frik,
Find attached two photos: IMGA0421 taken in 2006 and Image0027 taken in 2010. What is of importance between these two photos is that the pre-paid meters are now directly connected to the tree-phase input and no longer go through the meters creating a double meter condition.
When this condition was first raised my wife and I were told that the electrician that did the work assures the management and all concerned that the condition he left the system in 2006 was the condition all pre-paid meters must be connected. Now it is connected as I have suggested. So, either the management misled me then or now misleading me. Can it please be clarified as to the correct condition? Now, or then?
The purpose of this letter is:
1) To inform the chairman of the condition
2) To ask the chairman to inform all concerned about the alteration and have the monies overcharged to the correct accounts (either the then or the now).
3) If the condition as implemented now be correct ask the chairman to ask the manager that was misleading all to apologise to those that he may insulted.
Regards
PS Thank you very much for having the following conditions corrected before I had time to forward the complaints:
1) Having the new ladies toilet unlocked
2) Having the labour housing gate installed that was lying around for months now.
3) Having personally inspected the farm area before going to the next management meeting.
Waterpoort, 0905
+27 73 073 3505
Google profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/ernestbes/
Confidentiality Warning
This message/ e-mail contain confidential information and is intended only for the message recipient. Any disclosure, retransmission, dissemination, misuse or other use of this information is strictly prohibited and will lead to prosecution. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
The Disclaimer forms part of the content of this email in terms of section 11 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 25 of 2002.
No comments:
Post a Comment