The Chairman (Frik Birkenstock),
Dear Frik,
I don’t know if you were trying to be sarcastic, insulting, forgetful or see me as a close personal friend? Be it as it may, I wrote to you in my home language and out of respect I would have expected the reply in my preferred language or, at least an excuse if you were unable to have the proficiency in that language. In the past this may not have been a problem as my wife and I have been very tolerant to the abuse and insults the management dished out. But, with the stance the management has taken towards me and my wife, the management have thrown the gauntlet down and my wife and I demand the respect the constitution of this country allows us.
There are though some confusing issues that need to be cleared up by the directors of the share block scheme. The confusing items are:
1) The Companies act states that if one director makes a decision it is as if all directors made that decision.
2) The chairman gave me the assurance that one of the directors (Mr. David Bosch) will never act in his own capacity but always with permission.
3) Mr. David Bosch handed out notices that claim he never acts in his private capacity when it goes about the share block scheme business.
4) Yet, if you listen to the attached digital recording, Mr Bosch threatens the management that he will act on his own. How many more actions like this occurred? So, all directors then equally share the responsibly of this statement (according to the act).
The purpose if this letter is:
1) To inform the chairman of the share block scheme that I find his response offensive in as far as:
a. Ignoring my home language
b. Making it personal and ignoring the fact that it was an official letter.
2) To inform the chairman that by association, collectively all directors are held responsible.
3) To inform the chairman of the share block scheme that I will no longer tolerate such offensive onslaught. To prove my seriousness (and try and clear up some misconceptions) I have included my response to a lawyer from one of the members of the director team of the share block scheme.
4) To ask the chairman to peruse the attached letter (PDF format). Pay specific notice to my statements and requests regarding the discriminations and allegations.
5) To ask the chairman of the share block scheme to convey the just of my letter to all directors that was at the time (present and past).
6) There are also two MP3 files attached that I refer to in the letter to the lawyer and submitted to lawyer as part evidence. They are attached for three reasons:
a. The director’s lawyer seems to have accepted them as evidence
b. They clear up some of damaging lies to the reputation of my wife and me and
c. They start the corrective action required to clear up some of reputation damages spread by members of the directorship of the share block scheme.
7) To ask the chairman to convey this information to the rest of directors and notify them that I reserve the right to investigate further evidence and take further action (not only related to this letter, and its contents, but related to any similar action).
Sincere
Waterpoort, 0905
+27 73 073 3505
Google profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/ernestbes/
Confidentiality Warning
This message/ e-mail contain confidential information and is intended only for the message recipient. Any disclosure, retransmission, dissemination, misuse or other use of this information is strictly prohibited and will lead to prosecution. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
The Disclaimer forms part of the content of this email in terms of section 11 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 25 of 2002.
From: Frik Birkenstock [mailto:frik@sterkinekor.com]
Sent: 02 July 2010 10:00
To:
Subject: RE: Makhado Municipality notice: supplementary valuation roll -2009,2010
Dankie,
From:
Sent: Fri 2010/07/02 09:22 AM
To: Frik Birkenstock
Cc:
Subject: Makhado Municipality notice: supplementary valuation roll -2009,2010
The Chairman (Frik Birkenstock),
Dear Frik,
Find attached a Municipality notice that appeared in the local newspaper (Zoutpansberger of 25 June 2010).
The purpose of this letter is:
1) To bring this notice to the attention of the Chairman (of it hasn’t been done before).
2) If not brought to the attention of the Chairman, request the Chairman to inform all parties concerned as to why not.
3) To ask the Chairman to bring it under the notice of the manager allocated for such tasks
4) To request the Chairman to have this roll inspected and perform the appropriate action
5) To request the Chairman to notify all concerned regarding the action taken.
Sincerely
GEN (Ernest) Bessinger
PO Box 106,
Waterpoort, 0905
+27 73 073 3505
Google profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/ernestbes/
Confidentiality Warning
This message/ e-mail contain confidential information and is intended only for the message recipient. Any disclosure, retransmission, dissemination, misuse or other use of this information is strictly prohibited and will lead to prosecution. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
The Disclaimer forms part of the content of this email in terms of section 11 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 25 of 2002.
No comments:
Post a Comment